1
0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2024-12-04 14:46:57 -05:00
Commit Graph

106 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Giteabot
24e03a125d
Fix required error for token name () ()
Backport  by @earl-warren

- Say to the binding middleware which locale should be used for the
required error.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1683

(cherry picked from commit 5a2d7966127b5639332038e9925d858ab54fc360)

Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
2023-11-29 23:00:32 +08:00
techknowlogick
45976a1bde
Check blocklist for emails when adding them to account () 2023-08-30 10:46:49 -05:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels ()
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
Earl Warren
50fc22eecf
Add ThreadID parameter for Telegram webhooks ()
Telegram has recently implemented threads (channels) for group chats.

Co-authored-by: neveraskedtoexist <matikot415@gmail.com>
2023-08-13 14:00:06 +00:00
JakobDev
6598d0291c
Allow Organisations to have a E-Mail ()
Resolves 

This adds a E-Mail field to Organisations. The E-Mail is just shown on
the Profile when it is visited by a logged in User. The E-mail is not
used for something else.

**Screenshots:**

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/a8d622b3-7278-4c08-984b-9c5ebfdb5471)

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/6dcb1dd7-d04b-49eb-bc96-6582cfe9757b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-25 08:26:27 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
037c9895a7
Support copy protected branch from template repository ()
Fix 
2023-07-21 12:32:47 +08:00
6543
8995046110
Less naked returns ()
just a step towards  

and some related refactoring
2023-07-07 05:31:56 +00:00
wxiaoguang
ce46834b93
Remove "CHARSET" config option for MySQL, always use "utf8mb4" ()
In modern days, there is no reason to make users set "charset" anymore.

Close 

## ⚠️ BREAKING

The key `[database].CHARSET` was removed completely as every newer
(>10years) MySQL database supports `utf8mb4` already.
There is a (deliberately) undocumented new fallback option if anyone
still needs to use it, but we don't recommend using it as it simply
causes problems.
2023-06-21 10:49:25 +00:00
sillyguodong
35a653d7ed
Support configuration variables on Gitea Actions ()
Co-Author: @silverwind @wxiaoguang 
Replace: 

See:
- [defining configuration variables for multiple
workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows)
- [vars
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#vars-context)

Related to:
- [x] protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/7
- [x] act_runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/157
- [x] act: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/43

#### Screenshoot
Create Variable:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758288-032b7f64-44e7-48ea-b07d-de8b8b0e3729.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236758174-5203f64c-1d0e-4737-a5b0-62061dee86f8.png)

Workflow:
```yaml
  test_vars:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Print Custom Variables
        run: echo "${{ vars.test_key }}"
      - name: Try to print a non-exist var
        run: echo "${{ vars.NON_EXIST_VAR }}"
```

Actions Log:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/236759075-af0c5950-368d-4758-a8ac-47a96e43b6e2.png)

---
This PR just implement the org / user (depends on the owner of the
current repository) and repo level variables, The Environment level
variables have not been implemented.
Because
[Environment](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/deployment/targeting-different-environments/using-environments-for-deployment#about-environments)
is a module separate from `Actions`. Maybe it would be better to create
a new PR to do it.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-20 22:54:15 +00:00
sillyguodong
8228751c55
Support changing labels of Actions runner without re-registration ()
close 

related:
- Protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/9
- Runner side: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/201

changes:
- Add column of `labels` to table `action_runner`, and combine the value
of `agent_labels` and `custom_labels` column to `labels` column.
- Store `labels` when registering `act_runner`.
- Update `labels` when `act_runner` starting and calling `Declare`.
- Users cannot modify the `custom labels` in edit page any more.

other changes:
- Store `version` when registering `act_runner`.
- If runner is latest version, parse version from `Declare`. But older
version runner still parse version from request header.
2023-06-13 22:28:31 +08:00
Denys Konovalov
ca35dec18b
Add ability to set multiple redirect URIs in OAuth application UI ()
OAuth applications can already have multiple redirect URIs if
created/edited over API.

This change allows for setting multiple redirect URIs through the UI as
a comma-separated list (e. g.
`https://example.org/redirect,https://redirect.example.org`)

<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>

![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-06-04
17-14-40](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2206dc32-e7e4-4953-9ecb-e098890b3f54)
![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-06-04
17-14-50](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/cd97c73c-9310-44ee-a83a-b927a1ef94da)

</details>

Closes 
2023-06-05 15:00:12 +08:00
Jack Hay
18de83b2a3
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens ()
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
    - `activitypub`
    - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
    - `misc`
    - `notification`
    - `organization`
    - `package`
    - `issue`
    - `repository`
    - `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
  -  `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
  - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection

### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">

## tokenRequiresScopes  Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error

## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
   -  _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
   - For example: 
   ```go
	m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
		m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
		m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
   ```

## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default

Closes 
Closes 

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests ()
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
KN4CK3R
cdb088cec2
Add CRAN package registry ()
This PR adds a [CRAN](https://cran.r-project.org/) package registry.

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/210450039-d6fa6f77-20cd-4741-89a8-1624def267f7.png)
2023-05-22 10:57:49 +08:00
wxiaoguang
2cb66fff60
Support wildcard in email domain allow/block list ()
Replace  (which is stale and incomplete)

Close 

Major changes:

* Deprecate the "WHITELIST", use "ALLOWLIST"
* Add wildcard support for EMAIL_DOMAIN_ALLOWLIST/EMAIL_DOMAIN_BLOCKLIST
* Update example config file and document
* Improve tests
2023-05-22 00:05:44 +00:00
wxiaoguang
6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other ()
Replace 

Close 

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
Zettat123
e7c2231dee
Support for status check pattern ()
This PR is to allow users to specify status checks by patterns. Users
can enter patterns in the "Status Check Pattern" `textarea` to match
status checks and each line specifies a pattern. If "Status Check" is
enabled, patterns cannot be empty and user must enter at least one
pattern.
Users will no longer be able to choose status checks from the table. But
a __*`Matched`*__ mark will be added to the matched checks to help users
enter patterns.

Benefits:
- Even if no status checks have been completed, users can specify
necessary status checks in advance.
- More flexible. Users can specify a series of status checks by one
pattern.

Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/635738ad-580c-49cd-941d-c721e5b99be4)

After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/16aa7b1b-abf1-4170-9bfa-ae6fc9803a82)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-05-17 16:11:13 +08:00
KN4CK3R
5968c63a11
Add Go package registry ()
Fixes 

This PR adds a Go package registry usable with the Go proxy protocol.

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/328feb5c-3df2-4f9d-8eae-fe3126d14c37)
2023-05-14 23:38:40 +08:00
KN4CK3R
9173e079ae
Add Alpine package registry ()
This PR adds an Alpine package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package)
to build a *.apk package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry () and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after .


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/227779595-b76163aa-eea1-4a79-9583-775c24ad74e8.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-12 17:27:50 +00:00
KN4CK3R
05209f0d1d
Add RPM registry ()
Fixes 

This PR adds a RPM package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://opensource.com/article/18/9/how-build-rpm-packages) to
build a *.rpm package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry () and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after .


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/223806549-d8784fd9-9d79-46a2-9ae2-f038594f636a.png)
2023-05-05 20:33:37 +00:00
KN4CK3R
bf999e4069
Add Debian package registry ()
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry.
You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing.
Source packages are not supported at the moment and I did not find
documentation of the architecture "all" and how these packages should be
treated.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/218126879-eb80a866-775c-4c8e-8529-5797203a64e6.png)

Part of .

Revised copy of .

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-02 12:31:35 -04:00
Yarden Shoham
c0ddec8a2a
Revert "Add Debian package registry" ()
Reverts 
2023-04-28 18:06:41 -04:00
KN4CK3R
bf77e2163b
Add Debian package registry ()
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing. Source packages are not supported at the
moment and I did not find documentation of the architecture "all" and
how these packages should be treated.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-04-28 17:51:36 -04:00
Zettat123
ed7245f997
Title can be empty when creating tag only ()
Fixes 

Make the title not required. If the title is empty when creating release
(not tag), an error message will be displayed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/229761056-c52e338b-5f25-4d7d-bb44-2cb0304abcee.png)
2023-04-06 21:44:52 -04:00
KN4CK3R
c709fa17a7
Add Swift package registry ()
This PR adds a [Swift](https://www.swift.org/) package registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/211842523-07521cbd-8fb6-400f-820c-ee8048b05ae8.png)
2023-03-13 15:28:39 -05:00
wxiaoguang
188c8c12c2
Make Ctrl+Enter submit a pending comment (starting review) instead of submitting a single comment ()
Close 

Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.

After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.


The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-04 02:13:37 -05:00
Jason Song
c8c2a31818
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable ()
Fix .
2023-02-21 08:42:07 -06:00
Zettat123
9a83aa28a3
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule ()
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)

---

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)

The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 19:30:41 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
6221a6fd54
Scoped labels ()
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
Brecht Van Lommel
49919c636e
Pull Requests: setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, tweak UI ()
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.

This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.

Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-13 14:09:52 +08:00
Nathaniel Sabanski
fb1a2a13f0
Preview images for Issue cards in Project Board view ()
Original Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22102

This addition would be a big benefit for design and art teams using the
issue tracking.

The preview will be the latest "image type" attachments on an issue-
simple, and allows for automatic updates of the cover image as issue
progress is made!

This would make Gitea competitive with Trello... wouldn't it be amazing
to say goodbye to Atlassian products? Ha.

First image is the most recent, the SQL will fetch up to 5 latest images
(URL string).

All images supported by browsers plus upcoming formats: *.avif *.bmp
*.gif *.jpg *.jpeg *.jxl *.png *.svg *.webp

The CSS will try to center-align images until it cannot, then it will
left align with overflow hidden. Single images get to be slightly
larger!

Tested so far on: Chrome, Firefox, Android Chrome, Android Firefox.

Current revision with light and dark themes:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066878-58e6bf73-0c93-4caa-8d40-38f4432b3578.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066555-293f65c3-e706-4888-8516-de8ec632d638.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-11 16:12:41 +08:00
KN4CK3R
e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams ()
Fixes 

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
KN4CK3R
d987ac6bf1
Add Chef package registry ()
This PR implements a [Chef registry](https://chef.io/) to manage
cookbooks. This package type was a bit complicated because Chef uses RSA
signed requests as authentication with the registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213747995-46819fd8-c3d6-45a2-afd4-a4c3c8505a4a.png)


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213748145-d01c9e81-d4dd-41e3-a3cc-8241862c3166.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-06 09:49:21 +08:00
KN4CK3R
df789d962b
Add Cargo package registry ()
This PR implements a [Cargo registry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/)
to manage Rust packages. This package type was a little bit more
complicated because Cargo needs an additional Git repository to store
its package index.

Screenshots:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102004-08d812ac-c066-4969-9bda-2fed818554eb.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102141-d9970f14-dca6-4174-b17a-50ba1bd79087.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102244-dc05743b-78b6-4d97-998e-ef76341a978f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 18:12:31 +08:00
KN4CK3R
6ba9ff7b48
Add Conda package registry ()
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
2023-02-01 12:30:39 -06:00
Brecht Van Lommel
faa96553d1
Add repository setting to enable/disable releases unit ()
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
2023-02-01 01:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions ()
Close .

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on  if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng
de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens ()
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes 
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch ()
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix  and 

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jason Song
659055138b
Secrets storage with SecretKey encrypted ()
Fork of , but [gave up
MasterKey](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14483#issuecomment-1350728557),
and fixed some problems.

Close .
Needed by .

Featrues:
- Secrets for repo and org, not user yet.
- Use SecretKey to encrypte/encrypt secrets.
- Trim spaces of secret value.
- Add a new locale ini block, to make it easy to support secrets for
user.

Snapshots:

Repo level secrets:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823319-b8a4903f-38ca-4af7-9d05-336a5af906f3.png)

Rrg level secrets

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823371-8bd02e93-1928-40d1-8c76-f48b255ace36.png)

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-20 17:07:13 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
003b4e209c
Allow disable code tab ()
I know some users created a repository in an organization but just use
issues and projects to handle the whole organizations issues. So that
`Code` could be disabled per repository.

<img width="1148" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792075-346cb508-b620-4adb-bc9a-cba76fdcb294.png">

It could also become a wiki repository.

<img width="1173" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792324-e15c6f68-35c0-4105-ab77-83585ce53672.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-12 13:29:27 +08:00
Jason Song
f59a74852b
Update gitea-vet to check FSFE REUSE ()
Related to:
- 
- https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-vet/pulls/21

What it looks like when it's working:
https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/64040/1/5

All available SPDX license identifiers: [SPDX License
List](https://spdx.org/licenses/).

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-02 22:14:57 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files ()
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix 

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
Xinyu Zhou
68e934ab5d
Add option to enable CAPTCHA validation for login ()
Enable this to require captcha validation for user login. You also must
enable `ENABLE_CAPTCHA`.

Summary:
- Consolidate CAPTCHA template
- add CAPTCHA handle and context
- add `REQUIRE_CAPTCHA_FOR_LOGIN` config and docs
- Consolidate CAPTCHA set-up and verification code 

Partially resolved  

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-22 21:13:18 +00:00
KN4CK3R
32db62515f
Add package registry cleanup rules ()
Fixes 
Fixes 
Fixes 

This PR adds Cleanup Rules for the package registry. This allows to
delete unneeded packages automatically. Cleanup rules can be set up from
the user or org settings.
Please have a look at the documentation because I'm not a native english
speaker.

Rule Form

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330792-c13918a6-e196-4e71-9f53-18554515edca.png)

Rule List

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199331261-5f6878e8-a80c-4985-800d-ebb3524b1a8d.png)

Rule Preview

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330917-c95e4017-cf64-4142-a3e4-af18c4f127c3.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-20 16:08:38 +02:00
wxiaoguang
fb704f6c72
Revert unrelated changes for SMTP auth ()
The purpose of  is to improve the SMTP mailer, but there were some
unrelated changes made to the SMTP auth in
d60c438694

This PR reverts these unrelated changes, fix 
2022-11-10 16:12:23 -05:00
wxiaoguang
2900dc90a7
Improve valid user name check ()
Close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21640

Before: Gitea can create users like ".xxx" or "x..y", which is not
ideal, it's already a consensus that dot filenames have special
meanings, and `a..b` is a confusing name when doing cross repo compare.

After: stricter

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-04 17:04:08 +08:00
oliverpool
b6e81357bd
Add Webhook authorization header ()
_This is a different approach to , I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry )
- TeamCity 
- Gitea instances 
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in ), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones ).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry .

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
Gusted
c2d2323fc8
Configure update checker on installation page ()
- I recently became aware that this was enabled by-default, I don't
necessary agree with that and this should rather be configured by the
user(this patch does that on the installation page) as it connects to a
homeserver, which I'd prefer to avoid on my instance.


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25481501/199260613-a77a1b10-347a-4542-8982-9b9b24dad28c.png)
2022-11-01 19:23:56 +00:00
M Hickford
191a74d622
Record OAuth client type at registration ()
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.

> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
>   maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
>   confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
>   **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.

 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4

> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.

Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1

> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message

Fixes 

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 15:59:24 +08:00