mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
synced 2024-12-04 14:46:57 -05:00
Add TAGS
to TEST_TAGS
and fix bugs found with gogit (#31791)
Found at https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31790#issuecomment-2272898915 `unit-tests-gogit` never work since the workflow set `TAGS` with `gogit`, but the Makefile use `TEST_TAGS`. This PR adds the values of `TAGS` to `TEST_TAGS`, ensuring that setting `TAGS` is always acceptable and avoiding confusion about which one should be set.
This commit is contained in:
parent
df7f1c2ead
commit
de2787a493
2
Makefile
2
Makefile
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ TAGS ?=
|
||||
TAGS_SPLIT := $(subst $(COMMA), ,$(TAGS))
|
||||
TAGS_EVIDENCE := $(MAKE_EVIDENCE_DIR)/tags
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_TAGS ?= sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify
|
||||
TEST_TAGS ?= $(TAGS_SPLIT) sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify
|
||||
|
||||
TAR_EXCLUDES := .git data indexers queues log node_modules $(EXECUTABLE) $(FOMANTIC_WORK_DIR)/node_modules $(DIST) $(MAKE_EVIDENCE_DIR) $(AIR_TMP_DIR) $(GO_LICENSE_TMP_DIR)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ func TestReadingBlameOutputSha256(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
||||
defer cancel()
|
||||
|
||||
if isGogit {
|
||||
t.Skip("Skipping test since gogit does not support sha256")
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Without .git-blame-ignore-revs", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
repo, err := OpenRepository(ctx, "./tests/repos/repo5_pulls_sha256")
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
@ -6,11 +6,20 @@
|
||||
|
||||
package git
|
||||
|
||||
import "github.com/go-git/go-git/v5/plumbing"
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"errors"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/go-git/go-git/v5/plumbing"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func (repo *Repository) getTree(id ObjectID) (*Tree, error) {
|
||||
gogitTree, err := repo.gogitRepo.TreeObject(plumbing.Hash(id.RawValue()))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if errors.Is(err, plumbing.ErrObjectNotFound) {
|
||||
return nil, ErrNotExist{
|
||||
ID: id.String(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user